Is This You?

Teaching, leading, reporting — or all three.

Education evaluation lives in every corner of the institution. Here’s where most educators find their entry point.

  • Teaching or administering a K–12 program with state reporting requirements. WE have experience navigating the K-12 evaluation, research, and grant landscape!
  • Running a higher-ed initiative, grant-funded course, or academic program and need actionable data insights? WE can design Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods approaches to support you.
  • Going through reaccreditation and need a thorough, defensible self-study? WE have demonstrated success with helping programs get re-accredited.
  • Developing new curriculum and want evidence it’s working before you scale? WE have worked with higher education institutions to help them do strategic planning and curricular revision using data-driven insights!
  • Tracking student outcomes and looking for patterns worth addressing? WE understand how to design data collection, data structure, and effective visualization using platforms like Power BI or Tableau.
  • Evaluating whether an intervention — tutoring, technology, support services — moves the needle. Want to know how effective you have been or could be? WE will not only provide insights, but actionable recommendations.
  • Writing a grant that requires an evaluation plan but unsure where to begin? WE can help and have demonstrated success in securing multi-million dollar grants with data!
  • Generating data for a board, legislature, or accreditation body? WE work with policymakers to support what you are doing!

What We Do for You

Rigorous evaluation from the classroom to the accreditor.

We’ve worked on micro-evaluations of individual courses and macro root-cause analyses that reshaped whole curricula. The right scope depends on your question.

Program & Curriculum Evaluation

  • Formative evaluations while programs are growing
  • Summative evaluation for closing projects, grants, or programs
  • Curriculum alignment and coherence studies. Mapping and tagging support to measure student success that drives curricular change.
  • Root-cause and Gap analysis to drive better outcomes
  • Intervention effectiveness (tutoring, SEL, technology, etc.)

Assessment & Outcomes

  • Assessment design, item-writing, and assessment best practices
  • Student outcome measurement: retention, progression, completion
  • Post-graduation student success matters. WE can help with that
  • Aggregated vs. Disaggregated data? — Context matters, and WE can help you see who is thriving, and who isn’t
  • Culturally-responsive and Equity-informed interpretation of results

Accreditation Support

  • Self-study design and facilitation
  • Data collection for standard-by-standard documentation
  • Writing support for criterion narratives
  • Continuous improvement planning and evidence mapping
  • Site-visit preparation materials

Grant & Reporting

  • Evaluation plan writing for grant applications
  • Logic model and theory of change development
  • Annual and final reporting to state agencies and funders
  • Dissemination materials for practitioners and the public
  • Data storytelling for non-technical audiences

How It Works

From question to evidence — and back to practice.

Good evaluation in education starts with understanding the instructional context, not just the data. We learn your environment before we recommend a method.

Discover

What are you trying to learn? What decisions will this evidence support?

Align

Map your program theory — what you do, what you expect, and for whom.

Measure

Design or adapt instruments: assessments, surveys, interview protocols.

Analyze

Quantitative and qualitative analysis appropriate to your evidence.

Report

Clear findings for each audience: accreditors, funders, faculty, or students.

Improve

Actionable recommendations that feed directly back into the next cycle.

What the Work Reveals

Evidence that changed programs.

A pharmacy program’s first-time licensure pass rate was falling. A root-cause analysis exposed opportunities for growth in how the curriculum was assessed.

A full curriculum revision followed — a turnaround to #1 in the state, top 5 nationally.

ESL students were four times as likely to face a dismissal or repeat-year decision compared to their peers.

Grant-funded tutoring and language support helped them progress on par — and in some years, better.

First-generation students were leaving, lacking support to navigate financial aid and housing most take for granted.

Targeted onboarding and counseling improved retention for the students who needed it most.

Examples are anonymized. Detailed reports exist but are held under NDA.

Ready to measure what your program is actually doing?

Share the question — whether it’s one course or a whole institution. The first conversation will leave you with clarity about a path forward.

Start the conversation